Editorial Policy

Last updated: September 25, 2025

1. Our Editorial Mission
2. Editorial Policy – 7 Standards We Follow
3. Sources, Citations & Fact-Checking
4. Health/Finance (YMYL) Guidance
5. Editorial Policy – Review Workflow
6. Images, Media & Licensing
7. Updates, Refreshes & Versioning
8. Conflicts of Interest & Independence
9. Editorial Policy – Scope & Prioritization
10. Editorial Policy – Evidence & Conflicting Sources
11. Editorial Policy – Accessibility & Language
12. Editorial Policy – Reader Feedback
13. External Standards We Respect
14. Contact

Editorial Policy at Nest Of Wisdom explains how we research carefully, verify claims, and keep articles current so readers can trust what they read. Our goal is clear, practical guidance that respects culture, safety, and evidence.

Our Editorial Mission

We publish helpful guides across wellness, spirituality, finance, and everyday living. Articles are designed for beginners, written in plain language, and organized so you can act with confidence.

Editorial Policy – 7 Standards We Follow

• Accuracy: Significant claims are verified against reputable sources before publication.
• Clarity: Logical structure, table of contents, step-by-step explanations, and examples.
• Completeness: We address key reader questions, safety notes, and alternatives.
• Transparency: We disclose sponsorships/affiliates and label material updates or corrections.
• Evidence: Preference for primary research, academic/government sources, and current data.
• Accessibility: Descriptive headings, alt text, and minimal jargon for better understanding.
• Human Review: Final drafts are edited by a human before going live.

Sources, Citations & Fact-Checking

We cite credible institutions and peer-reviewed research where appropriate. Citations are included as contextual links so readers can evaluate evidence. When a topic includes statistics or health considerations, sources are cross-checked, and we avoid overstating certainty.

Health/Finance (YMYL) Guidance

Topics that may influence health or finances receive extra scrutiny. We avoid unverified promises, include disclaimers and safety notes, and recommend consulting licensed professionals when appropriate. Information on this site is educational and not a substitute for professional advice or care.

Editorial Policy – Review Workflow

1. Planning: Outline scope, reader questions, and safe-use context.
2. Drafting: Research with credible sources; add steps, tables, and checklists where useful.
3. Edit & fact-check: A human editor verifies claims, structure, and clarity.
4. Publish & monitor: We monitor feedback and update when new evidence emerges.

Images, Media & Licensing

Images are original, licensed, or used under permitted terms and include descriptive alt text. If you believe an image needs credit or review, please contact us and we will address it promptly.

Updates, Refreshes & Versioning

We refresh pages when new evidence appears or clearer explanations are available. Substantive changes are labeled “Updated” with a date. Major factual changes are handled under our Corrections Policy and may include a brief summary of what changed.

Conflicts of Interest & Independence

Editorial opinions are independent. If an article includes affiliate links or sponsorships, we disclose this within the page. Partners do not dictate our conclusions or coverage.

Editorial Policy – Scope & Prioritization

Our Editorial Policy prioritizes fixes and improvements that matter most to readers. Items that could change a decision or affect safety rise to the top; minor style edits follow once substantive issues are resolved.

• High priority: Numbers, dates, citations, and health/finance cautions that could materially mislead.
• Medium: Missing context, ambiguous wording, or weak sourcing that needs strengthening.
• Low: Typos and formatting that do not alter meaning.

Editorial Policy – Evidence & Conflicting Sources

When sources disagree, we compare quality, recency, and consensus. Our Editorial Policy favors primary research, government and academic publications, and recognized professional bodies. If uncertainty remains, we state it openly and avoid overconfident claims until stronger data emerges.

Older pages are periodically reviewed to check whether new studies or policy changes call for an update, re-analysis, or clarification note.

Editorial Policy – Accessibility & Language

Clarity is part of accuracy. We aim for plain language, descriptive headings, and helpful summaries so beginners can follow along. Where a topic is technical, we add short “in simple terms” explainer boxes. Images include alt text for accessibility and are used only when licensed or original.

Editorial Policy – Reader Feedback

Constructive feedback improves our work. If you notice an error, unclear explanation, or a missing source, please let us know via the Contact page. Verified issues are handled under our Corrections Policy and, when material, disclosed with a date-stamped note.

External Standards We Respect

Our approach aligns with widely recognized editorial guidance:

• Society of Professional Journalists – Code of Ethics
• Poynter – Best Practices for Corrections Policies

Contact

For editorial questions, reach us via the Contact page or review our Privacy Policy.