Corrections Policy
Last updated: September 25, 2025


- What This Corrections Policy Covers
- How to Report an Error
- Our 4-Step Review & Correction Process
- Types of Corrections & Actions
- Timelines
- Disclosure, Versioning & Transparency
- Contact
- External Standards We Respect
Corrections Policy explains how we receive reports, verify facts, and correct pages so readers can rely on accurate, up-to-date information across Nest Of Wisdom.
What This Corrections Policy Covers
Accuracy and clarity are core to our editorial mission. When errors are identified—by readers, contributors, or editors—we correct them as quickly and transparently as possible. This Corrections Policy applies to all content, including health, finance, and practical living guides.
How to Report an Error
If you believe a page contains an error or unclear statement, please send:
- The page URL
- A short description of the issue
- Any reliable sources that support the correction
Use our Contact page (suggested subject line: Correction Request). We acknowledge reports and keep you informed if we need more details.
Our 4-Step Review & Correction Process
- Triage: We log the report, assess potential impact, and prioritize safety-critical issues first.
- Verification: Editors compare statements against reputable sources and, when needed, consult additional references.
- Decision: We choose the right action—clarification, update, or factual correction—and prepare the change.
- Publication: We implement the fix, add a note when material, and monitor for follow-ups.
Types of Corrections & Actions
- Minor edits: Typos, grammar, or formatting. Implemented silently.
- Clarifications: Language improved for clarity without changing the meaning. Labeled “Updated.”
- Factual corrections: Substantive changes to data or claims. Labeled “Corrected” with a brief note.
- Removals or retractions: Rare. Used when content is unsafe, unverifiable, or conflicts with policy pending review.
Timelines
We aim to acknowledge within 2–3 business days and resolve verified issues as quickly as reasonably possible based on complexity and research time.
Disclosure, Versioning & Transparency
Material updates are labeled at the top or bottom of a page with an “Updated” or “Corrected” note and date. Significant changes may include a short summary of what changed and why. We periodically review older articles to ensure sustained accuracy.
For privacy and data handling practices related to messages you send, see our Privacy Policy.
Contact
To request a correction, please use our Contact page. We appreciate reader feedback and take every credible report seriously.
External Standards We Respect
Our approach is informed by widely recognized guidance on transparency and accountability in publishing. Helpful resources include:
- Society of Professional Journalists – Code of Ethics
- Poynter – Best Practices for Corrections Policies
Scope & Prioritization
We prioritize corrections that could materially impact readers’ decisions, especially in health and finance topics. Safety-critical or potentially misleading claims are reviewed first. Minor style edits are queued behind substantive issues so we can focus on clarity and accuracy where it matters most.
- High priority: Facts that could change outcomes, numbers, dates, citations, safety notes.
- Medium: Ambiguous wording, missing context, weak sourcing that needs strengthening.
- Low: Typos and minor formatting that do not affect meaning.
Disagreements & Evidence
When sources disagree, we compare the quality and recency of evidence, favoring primary research and authoritative organizations. If uncertainty remains, we note it transparently and avoid definitive language until stronger evidence is available.
Accessibility & Languages
We aim to write in plain language and avoid jargon. If an explanation is too technical, we will add a simpler summary. Readers may submit suggestions in English or Tamil; we will respond in the same language where possible.
Examples of Corrections
- Correcting a nutrition value or dosage that was mis-typed.
- Replacing a broken or outdated citation with a current, authoritative source.
- Clarifying a step-by-step instruction to remove ambiguity.
These practices help maintain accuracy and trust across Nest Of Wisdom.